The Supreme Court of the United States permits public possession of weapons



New York law required a license to leave the house with a gun

On Thursday, the US Supreme Court rejected a New York law that required a permit for people to carry firearms in public and equated possession with the “right to have weapons” based on Monday. Constitution amendment.
With six votes in favor and three against, the judges affirm that the legislation “protects the right of people to carry a weapon outside the home in self-defense”. New York state law is similar to other locations, such as Hawaii, California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, which also require a license to carry guns in public. In the case of New York it was necessary to provide a justification for the need to carry a gun. Now, it is possible that all of these states are being questioned about their legislation and that more people decide to carry guns on the streets.
Following the Supreme Court decision, the powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), the country’s largest pro-gun political lobby group, celebrated the decision and called the result a “victory”. On the New York Stock Exchange, shares of Smith & Wesson, one of the largest arms manufacturers, were up more than 7.5%.
On the political side, the reactions were opposite. President Joe Biden said he was “deeply disappointed” by the decision, which comes at a time when Democrats are trying to impose some rules on arms purchases, especially among children under 21.
Debates on the subject began to rise again following the massacre of 21 people, 19 of them children, in a kindergarten in Uvalde, Texas, in late May. A few days earlier, the city of Buffalo, New York recorded a massacre of 10 blacks in a supermarket. The killer was a white supremacist.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul called the Supreme Court decision “shameful” and “shocking”. “It’s a shame this dark day has come,” she told MSNBC.
Hochul said the administration “will look into all options available” in the legislature and “will do everything in our power to protect New Yorkers from firearms and uphold state common sense gun laws.”
The same line was taken by the capital’s mayor, Eric Adams, who said the decision “exposes the population to greater risks of gun violence” – the city recently had an attack on a subway station that resulted in nearly 30 wounded. .
The New York Police Department said it was preparing to face a “revolution” following the Supreme Court decision. This year alone, the police had already seized more than 3,000 weapons – including rifles – from the streets and arrests for illegal possession of weapons are at the highest level in 28 years. .

Source: Terra

━ more like this


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here